close
close

Are we waiting for Ho Chi Minh, Mandela, Gandhi to appear?

Are we waiting for Ho Chi Minh, Mandela, Gandhi to appear?

The desire to belong to a free and independent homeland is born from deep psychological, social and cultural roots, providing a sense of identity, security and belonging. This intrinsic unity explains why people throughout history have fought for independence. Examples include the struggles of the Kurds, Basques, Catalans, Scots and Irish, all for self-determination.
Similarly, Theodor Herzl’s efforts at the First Zionist Congress in 1897 emphasized the need to establish a national home for the Jewish people, and today’s Palestinians are fighting for the same goal. Thus, while he may denounce or be shocked by the events of October 7, 2023 — when an armed group attacked Israeli forces, resulting in the deaths of more than 1,200 Israelis, the capture of about 250, and subsequent devastating repercussions in Gaza — – these events stem from historical patterns seen in liberation movements.

Gaza has suffered immense losses: over 40,000 Palestinians have been killed, many more injured and millions displaced. However, the motivations behind such acts are found in the universal desire for freedom and the rejection of external domination. Liberation struggles have historically been driven by the desire to preserve cultural identity, language, traditions and dignity, even among prosperous groups such as the Basques, Catalans, Scots and Irish. The refusal to live under foreign domination often goes beyond material prosperity, as the countless independence movements around the world demonstrate.

Attention to the plight of Gaza may have waned following the clear defeat of Hamas in its confrontation with Israel, but this does not mean the defeat of the Palestinian cause or the loss of their rights. Such actions should be seen in the wider context of legitimate struggles for justice and sovereignty. This perspective does not equate to supporting any ideological group, but recognizes the historical precedence of resistance. Notable figures, including some in Israel, have recognized the legitimacy of the Palestinian resistance. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak noted that if he had been Palestinian, he would have joined a resistance group.

Ami Ayalon, a former Israeli intelligence chief, echoed similar sentiments. Leaders like Ho Chi Minh also remind us that the pursuit of freedom often requires immense sacrifice, as seen in Vietnam’s protracted struggles against French and American occupation. The Palestinian movement, while plagued by internal betrayal and corruption, is not unique in these challenges. Most liberation struggles faced similar obstacles. Victory, as history shows, is possible when determination and sacrifice persist, as demonstrated by leaders like Gandhi and Mandela. Ultimately, the way forward for the Palestinians must be determined by themselves. Their options include armed resistance, passive resistance, or acceptance of the status quo. Such a decision should come through a general referendum under international supervision, ensuring that their voices are heard and respected.

Ahmad Alsarraf